
A year ago, an academic report analysing 537,413 corporate press releases found that 24% of the text was attributable to LLMs. In the yea
r since, AI use by PR teams has increased. Muck Rack's State of AI in PR 2026 report found 74% of PR professionals now use AI to write and create content, while 86% use it to edit and refine their work.
Coincidentally, or not as the case may be, the number of juniors being hired into the industry is on a downward trajectory. Latte's 2026 PR Talent Trends Report, analysing data from over 8,000 London-based PR professionals, showed declining numbers of up to 9%. That's not insignificant.
Are these two facts related? Is AI replacing junior roles? In some cases, perhaps. My belief is that agencies will always need junior staff, but that the role these junior teammates play will be different.
The role of the account executive
There's clearly an alignment between the traditional junior job description and the tasks AI is being used to manage. Media list hygiene. Research. Coverage reports. These can now all be handled by automation, agentic and generative AI. That sounds great on paper. It frees up time and increases team bandwidth, but it misses an important point. Because these tasks were never just side quests. They were the PR person's apprenticeship.
Executives have always cut their teeth with this type of work. It's how they’ve learned time management and developed an eye for quality before moving on to bigger strategic responsibilities. Without that administrative foundation, they risk being pushed upwards too quickly, taking on work they're not ready for. Long term that will have a direct impact on the quality of mid- and senior-level teams.
Clearly, account executives must continue to exist. The separation between exec and manager was never arbitrary, it was structural. Managers had strategic headspace because execs were in the weeds. But with fewer weeds to swim through, it would be foolish not to recognise that their trajectory will change as the role morphs into that of the fast-track manager. If that division breaks down, then twelve months into their careers, PR executives will already be building direct journalist relationships and sitting in strategy sessions.
This is mostly good news. Faster development means better retention. People are less likely to leave because they're bored of admin. Juniors will also be able to justify their salaries faster as the traditional two-year period before being introduced to more creative and strategic tasks, shifts into six months of intensive learning instead.
Learning to recognise 'bad'
But if you've never written a bad pitch, how do you recognise when an LLM has produced one? This is the real challenge. By removing admin from juniors, we don't risk their obsolescence, we risk a skills gap. Our fast-tracked managers may spot the obvious errors, but miss the subtle ones, such as an angle that doesn't quite land or a release that reads fine but says nothing.
The answer isn't to resist the shift. Resistance is futile. It's to acknowledge that if executives are going to be leaning into strategy faster, then the teaching syllabus for fresh industry faces needs to adapt. One option might be rotating new starters through intensive periods of shadowing senior staff on live client work. Alternatively, it might look like pairing AI-generated outputs with manual exercises, so juniors understand both what the tool did and what it missed.
Agencies that already work in technically complex sectors may have an advantage here. They've spent years developing frameworks to teach juniors the technical specifications of their clients, and the nature of the content they produce means they are less likely to accept what the AI turns out without a critical eye.
Whatever the models adopted, they need to be intentional. The traditional training-on-the-job system has worked because the time spent in the executive role allowed for frequent repetition and that repetition created instinct. If we get this right, then fast-tracked won't mean underprepared it will mean we have built a generation of PR professionals who understand that hitting the ‘up arrow’ isn't the same as doing good work.
Written by
Charlotte Bass, Head of PR at integrated B2B technology marketing agency Napier.
If you enjoyed this article, sign up for free to our twice weekly editorial alert.
We have six email alerts in total - covering ESG, internal comms, PR jobs and events. Enter your email address below to find out more: