Opinion

Unions must update the way they communicate says Bell Pottinger’s chairman David Wilson

Date: 06 February 2011 22:05
  
Stay in touch with PRmoment.com

Reinventing, refreshing and modernising. Brands can’t stand still – if they do they wither, perish and die. As our world changes, so brands need to change with the times and embrace the new environments in which they exist, just as we do ourselves … we never stop building and learning. 

But what of those organisations whose very ethos may, perceptionally at least, be considered outdated for the 21st Century? Surely the greatest example of those facing such a challenge would be the unions. In looking at this example, I declare an interest. As a fledgling cub trainee reporter working a 50-plus hour week, I was lobbied to join the then powerful National Union of Journalists (NUJ).

Intrigued, my mind was swayed by a NUJ vote to strike in favour of printers who’d been dismissed eight months before following opposition to the group’s modernising plan. This had divided the company. With dwindling numbers of hardline pickets still standing sentry at group HQ, their journalist brethren had finally decided to show solidarity.

It wasn’t the vote which made me question the merit of joining their rank, more the 27/22 ballot result to reject a strike. The NUJ’s next move? Yep, this “democratic” movement provided the minority with their picketing orders for two weeks of unproductive disruption, while the majority worked normally. How could a minority rule in a democratic country? In those days, union madness held sway. The experience highlighted a need for change and new laws followed – imposed by a Thatcher Government.

Time has passed, and unions have merged and rebranded, but trends show that overall union membership has more than halved from the 1980s’ heyday (Source: UK Government of BIS publication).

Back in the 1980s, disputes for miners, dockers, printers, public sector workers and others seemed commonplace. Union disputes gave way to violent scenes in Brixton and Toxteth, tearing at the very fabric of our society.

Fast forward three decades and student demonstrations have descended into violent disorder. Underground and overground rail strikes have stopped trains operating. Public service workers are protesting. Unions are flexing their muscles. Has the world wound back three decades?

Possibly yes. But there are fundamental differences.

Our present Coalition Government is faced with cost-cutting necessity to balance economic books, just as the Tory Government had in the 1980s. What is different – if polls are true – is the fact that up and down the country the public believes in the need for economic prudence.

So what might shift opinion towards our trade union bruvvers and get support for industrial action to protect members’ terms and jobs? Targeting “big impact” opportunities like Christmas and Easter holidays, or even a royal wedding, will simply lose them public support and sympathy.

With a little over seven million union members among a 62 million strong UK population, the unions possess a powerful force to convey their message effectively. But the “cloth cap” mentality that still adorns the rhetoric of certain union leaders won’t help their cause. People need to see and understand justification for any disruption.

Union leaders must drop the bravado and begin to communicate effectively, in a modern language for a modern society. Then people will begin to listen, approve and endorse them. They need not look further than their own slimming membership numbers to underline the need for change.

On the political front, strike action would surely play into the hands of Cameron and Clegg, at a time when an ineffective union-funded Labour Party is still in transition … some might say turmoil! So wouldn’t it be refreshing for union leaders to drop the militancy, take a seat at the leadership table, and with realism and an open mind, hold constructive discussions that will shape better futures.

Time has moved on but some union leaders have not. Will they grasp the nettle and recognise that every brand has to modernise to embrace new times?

David Wilson is Chairman of Bell Pottinger Public Relations.

Enjoyed this article? Click here to read more Opinion features

Share this article


Stay in touch with PRmoment.com

Comments

when talking to their own members, trade unions do "communicate effectively, in a modern language for a modern society" - visit cwu.org for an excellent example. When speaking to the wider world, unions struggle to overcome media stereotypes as replicated by David Wilson. Changing this perception is as much the responsibility of journalists and PR companies to overcome their prejuduces and communicate efectively and honestly, representing the real modern society and a unions place in it.

Name: kevin slocombe
cwu.org
Date: 08 Feb 2011 01:31 PM

Let's deal with the Great Royal Wedding Strike Scandal. The irritating little fact is that this wasn't union bravado, it was a media creation - first raised in the Times on 30 December by Rob Lea after his interview with PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka, when Mark had responded to his question about timing by saying, "It wouldn't be a factor". Cue headlines that we were targeting the royal wedding. Nowt so blind as them that can't see and all that. Let's also deal with the fact that Bob Crow, one of the media's favourite 'cloth cap bully boys' who pulls no punches with his comms, just happens to lead a union that has quite the opposite of a 'slimming membership'. Its membership continues to rise. But, more importantly, you accuse unions of not doing anything to update their comms. But you're woefully short of citations and evidence. It's precisely because the union I work for, PCS, doesn't share your pessimistic view that cuts are necessary that we are running a campaign with a clear message: There is an alternative. And, as part of that, we have published a pamphlet outlining exactly what that alternative is http://www.pcs.org.uk/altdoc and are busy engaging with the public and other campaigners (including the oh-so-modern UK Uncut) on these issues. Richard PCS national press officer

Name: Richard Simcox
www.pcs.org.uk
Date: 08 Feb 2011 01:36 PM

Mr Wilson starts by suggesting that the trade union ethos is outdated. And yet the idea of individuals coming together to have a little bit more control over their life; building a voluntary organisation so that they can be better represented; workers trying to have more of a role in their workplace; making regular financial contributions so that their members can have access to services - that all sounds a bit like the Big Society. I thought that was all the rage….. He also focuses in on the industrial disputes, as if it were the only activity of trade unions. You could argue that stories about trade union activism are, for many, the only communication from trade unions. But Mr Wilson talks about the importance of the brand, and of course our view of a brand is going to be most influenced by personal experience. And it is that personal experience, and I suspect the experience of many others, that has shaped my view of the trade union brand. On a daily basis trade unions are involved in supporting their members in discussions with employers, supporting them in local discussions about changes to conditions and helping to find legal remedy when employers step over the mark. There continue to be a small number of industrial disputes compared to the constructive discussions, and it seems to have some success. The report he refers to as his source for the membership fees tells us that about one in three employees had their pay affected by collective agreements. It also referred to research showing that trade union members earned on average 15.3% more than the earning of non-members. Mr Wilson is right that every organisation needs to modernise. There is a need to Trade Unions to develop their communication. They need to get better at presenting the positives. But most communicators will recognise that trade unions work in a highly politicised environment where there are people that want to damage them for their own ends. The research also shows that the public are turning away from the UK Govt plans. 28% believe we are heading in the right direction according to ComRes. 55% think that they are cutting to deep and too quickly. The Unions may well become a vehicle to deliver that message.

Name: Jason Wassell

Date: 08 Feb 2011 09:17 PM

No depth of evidence, precious little analysis and the last time I saw a cloth cap it was firmly on a city banker's head in their second home in the Cotswolds, where incidentally my union have our state of the art education and training centre. Interestingly we teach communication skills there. We don;t teach trade unionists PR. We teach them to tell the truth and to deal with the facts.

Name: Trish Lavelle
www.cwueducation.org
Date: 09 Feb 2011 05:20 PM

From a PR firm who represents a palm oil company, a GM food company, oil company criticised by UN, and staffed by hard-right Tory supporters. In next week's post, Mugabe's wife writes about land reform (who Bell Pottinger also held talks with re lobbying).

Name: Matt Learmouth
www.alchemypr.com
Date: 11 Feb 2011 12:35 PM

Post a Comment
Name Comments
Website
Email
Tick to receive comment notifications for this article  

Enter the words above: