Hacked Off Flack

Why Hacked Off misses the golden days of PR

Date: 22 June 2012 10:16
Join our community

The old bugger, Mr Arse, who founded our agency is paying us a visit. He is treating us to lunch at his club, and I expect I will be as sick as a dog at the end of it. Not because the food isn’t fabulous at his old-boy’s club (although it isn’t as great as it should be), but because I will be feeling horribly jealous. He made loads of money working in PR, lives in a great, big, f*ck-off mansion in Surrey and enjoys a huge pension. Because of his great talent? That’s what he thinks, and to be fair he deserves credit for some great campaigns. But the real reason he made money out of PR is because he worked in the industry at the right time.

What is particularly irksome is that Mr Arse thinks that people in PR these days are useless compared to PR people in his day. Despite the fact that young PR people have it so much harder. Not that I qualify as a young person any more, although I still have fifty years of work ahead of me as I won’t be able to afford to retire.

Oh! to have worked in PR in the 1970s and 1980s! Even the 1990s wasn’t half bad. Let’s face it, people who worked in PR in the old days had it easy:

1. Clients had more money to spend, and didn’t gripe about spending it on PR.

2. PR gurus were genuinely respected, even if they didn’t really deserve this respect.

3. There were budgets to take journalists out for lavish lunches, that lasted all afternoon.

4. If you weren’t drinking champagne, it was because you were sniffing something stronger.

5. No one used computers, so PR wasn’t ruled by geeks.

6. Houses were so cheap you could actually afford to buy one, even if you were just a PR manager.

7. Smoking was acceptable. You could smoke 40 fags a day at your desk if you felt like it. And that was after smoking on the train on your way to work.

8. Ageism in PR meant that senior partners were pensioned off early. With huge pensions (that the rest of us are paying for now).

 

Share this article


Stay in touch with PRmoment.com

Comments

So it's a shame that 4. You can't get pissed and, even worse, can't get away with doing coke at work. 5. Let's imagine a world where you don't have inter-connected businesses for whom PR is an absolute necessity. 7. You can't damage your health, and the health of every poor sap around you, with tobacco? Bummer. Man up people. Self-confessed geek.

Name: Jonathan

Date: 26 Jun 2012 09:34 AM

Do you guys actually read the articles you post? This is such cack. Yes it's a pity the budgets aren't bigger, but that's not so we can get pissed all day, but because we can't be as imaginative and flamboyant with our campaigns as we once were. Yes I'd love to go on the odd PR hospitality trip, but personally I'm quite happy that i'm not an alcoholic, drug-addled hack with emphysema. I am also happy that I am not an enabler to the numerous 'old-school' journalists who ended up with serious drinking problems as a result of our big PR budgets. Thank you.

Name: Charlie

Date: 26 Jun 2012 09:47 AM

Brilliant - shame some readers have either had a sense of humour bypass or don't recognise irony!

Name: Jane

Date: 26 Jun 2012 01:44 PM

Jane, have you looked up the definition of irony lately?

Name: Neve

Date: 26 Jun 2012 01:50 PM

I must admit having witnessed and worked through the end of this time and into the present day, there is a desperate yearning for a bygone era when most creative professionals were equipped with sufficient wit and turn of phrase that prevented them from ever reaching for a vapid, transatlantic cliche such as 'Man up people'.

Name: Mark Perkins

Date: 26 Jun 2012 02:08 PM

Neve, have you looked up the definition of humour lately?

Name: James

Date: 26 Jun 2012 02:09 PM

James, have you even read this article (and any others in this abominable column for that matter)? It's the most excruciatingly unfunny thing trying to be funny I have ever seen.

Name: Louise

Date: 26 Jun 2012 02:20 PM

James, humour is the tendency of particular cognitive experiences to provoke laughter and provide amusement. Laughter and amusement were neither provoked nor provided by this post, or by your little quip.

Name: Neve

Date: 26 Jun 2012 02:24 PM

Neve - stop taking yourself so seriously. This was obviously meant to be tongue-in-cheek and to be offended by it, is akin to complaining that Ab Fab or the Head of Brand in the tv series 2012 is not a true reflection of the industry - lighten-up...

Name: Jeni

Date: 26 Jun 2012 02:31 PM

An Fab is funny.

Name: Charlie

Date: 26 Jun 2012 02:38 PM

Maybe there was more time for long lunches in the old days because people weren't distracted by writing supercilious comments on blogs or looking up definitions on dictionary.com to make irrelevant points backing their humourless uptight point of view... bring back the old days in that case...

Name: Jo

Date: 26 Jun 2012 03:25 PM

This series of supercilious (which by the way is an excellent word Jo) and irrelevant comments have provoked laughter and provided amusement. But this article is still a steaming pile of shite.

Name: Neve

Date: 26 Jun 2012 03:46 PM

supercalifragilisticexpialidocious ... I didn't even have to look that one up! Go me.

Name: Charlie

Date: 26 Jun 2012 03:55 PM

Post a Comment
Name Comments
Website
Email
Tick to receive comment notifications for this article  

Enter the words above: